Two negative images of the emerging church have stuck in my mind since Greenbelt. They're not good images and I'd like to be able to say that all the fantastic things that I saw of the emerging church at GB outweighed these two moments...unfortunately they did not. I am a great fan of the emerging church but there is a danger that unless we address these two issues seriously, then we will 'perpetuate the failings of Christendom' (i think that's something John Drane said).
One moment involved the exclusion of a female from a particular conversation by a group of men. No intentionally, probably not even noticed, but there was a genuine exclusion which angered the woman excluded. Everybody that i know within the emerging church has a positive view of women in leadership - why is this not outworked in practice? I was chatting with a friend who was involved with an emerging church and he commented that whenever they were asked to do things they always made sure that a man and woman attended. This modeled partnership but also prevented the cult of personality growing. I think that we can no longer shrug out shoulders and say, 'yes it is a problem, but we don't know why' - that is an inadequate response that we should be ashamed of.
Second moment, I was on contributors patio working on something and within earshot were two guys both in leadership positions within the emerging church talking philosophy. Whilst i have no problem with this on a academic level, it did portray an image of the emerging church as an exclusive self-indulgent academic pretentious clique.
Two rather ugly sides of the emerging church, two missiological failings, two gospel failings...
Technorati Tags: Ben Edson, emerging church, Gender, mission