Last night I watched and listened with wonder at Brian Cox exploring the creation of the universe in his evocative series the wonders of the universe. I then caught 10 minutes of an interview with him this morning on the radio, during the interview the interviewer mentioned that the BBC were going to turn the music down on the programme as they'd received complaints that it was too loud. Cox disagreed wanting the music louder and explaining this by saying that it was not a lecture but a presentation where the music helped to evoke an emotional reaction to that which was being presented. He commented on how much thought was put into the presentation of the show - which locations were selected and camera shots chosen to inspire and draw people into physics. It truly is a beautiful piece of television where music and images sit well together with Cox's descriptions bringing about awe at what is out there.
It got me thinking about how we communicate. Cox has taken physics, which whilst I'm sure is v.v. interesting, and made is popular and accessible. The music does this, as does the filming, but what I also think is intriguing is that what is often perceived to be rather dull is being sexed up through the use of music and imagery to bring about an emotion response. As I watch the show many of the facts wash over me as I'm caught in the beauty of the universe and how the music stirs me to respond. I'm left wondering which I value most my emotional response or my factual understanding...
I saw the programme and heard this mornings interview too.
I agree the TV show is visually jaw dropping and cinematic in its scope whilst the physics he actually teaches us is pretty sparse and fairly straightforward - with some aweinspiring facts and figures thrown in. I know a little bit about physics so was left wanting more depth and detail but then Cox's defence of his style on Radio4 this morning changed my mind.
The TV series isnt really there to teach us physics, its there to inspire awe, through facts, visuals and music. It does this wonderfully well, its perfect Sunday evening viewing. Cox wants that sense of awe to drive people to find out more ( for example why does each element have its own signature spectrum? - the answer is fascinating and opens up even more, deeper questions about the nature of the universe), for that we need to read books, study a course etc etc.
So when I watch next week I won't be longing for more facts and theory from the show (I have books where I can find out about these things) I will sit back, with a quality malt, and enjoy the ride.
How this informs the way we communicate about our faith is another matter...
Every blessing,
Ric
Posted by: Ric Stott | March 14, 2011 at 08:52 PM